5.+References


 * Anderson, S. & Balsamo, 2003, A Pedagogy for Original Synners, Digital Youth, Innovation and the Unexpected, ?? ||
 * Anderson, V. & Hidi, S., 1988, Teaching Students to Summarise, Educational Leadership, vol.46, no. 4, pp. 26-28 ||
 * ASSIST inventory ||
 * Azevedo, R. 2005, Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning, Educational Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 4, pp.193-197 ||
 * Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L., 2008, The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 39, no.5, pp.775-786 ||
 * [|Bensmiller, K. (2005). Truly, madly, deeply engaged - global youth, media and technology. Report commissioned by Yahoo! & OMD. Retrieved 4th May 2007 at http://www.iabaustralia.com.au/Truly_Madly_Final_booklet.pdf] ||
 * Biggs, J. 1979, Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes, Higher Education, vol. 8, pp. 381-394 ||
 * Biggs, J., 2001, The revised two-factor Study Process Questinannaire R-SPQ-2F, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 71, no 1., pp. 133-149 ||
 * Biggs, J., Kembler, D., Leung, D.Y.P, 2001, The Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 71, pp. 133-149 ||
 * Biggs, J.B. (1987) //Study Process Questionnaire Manual and Questionnaire//, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne. ||
 * Bliss, L. B. 2002, An Instrument for the Assessment of Study Behaviors of High School Students, paper prrsented ||
 * Bowles, T., 2008, The relationship of time orientation with perceived academic performance and preparation for assessment in adolescents, Educational Psychology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 551=565 ||
 * [|Boyd, D. 2006. Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing Community Into Being on Social Network Sites. First Monday. 11(12). Retrieved 16th May 2007 at: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html*] ||
 * Brandt, R., 1988, On Learning Research: A Conversation with Lauren Resnick, Educational Leadership, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 12-16 ||
 * Brandt, R., 1988, Strategies for teaching learning strategies, Educational Leadership, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 15 ||
 * Breck, J. (2002). //How We Will Learn in the 21st Century.// The Scarecrow Press, Inc, London. ||
 * Brower, A., & Dettinger, K. 1998, What IS a Learning Community, About Campus ? ||
 * Brown, A. (1988) Motivation to learn and understand: On taking charge of one's own learning, Cognition and Instructions, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 311-321 ||
 * Brown, W.F. & Holtzman, W. H. (1955) A Study-Attitudes Questionnaire for predicting academic success, Journal fo Educational Psychology, vol. 46, no.1, pp. 75-83 ||
 * Bugg, J.M., DeLosh, E.L., McDaniel, M.A., 2008, Improving Students' Study Habits by Demonstrating the Mnemonic Benefits of Semantic Processing, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 35, no. 96-98 ||
 * Butterfield, L. (2005). //Cybersafety: An Intrinsic Part of the Online Experience.// In K.W.Lai (Ed.), //e-Learning Communities: Teaching and Learning with the Web.// Dunedin: Otago University Press. ||
 * Callahan, S., Schenk, M., White, N. ? Building a collaborative workplace ? ||
 * Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (2001). //E-Learning: The Partnership Challenge//. OECD, France. ||
 * Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A., 2003, Personality predicts academoc performace: Evidence from two logitudinal university samples, Journal of Research on Personality, vol. 27, pp.319-338 ||
 * Chen, S., Frempong, G. & Cudmore, W. (2006). Gesture Friendly Interfaces for Classroom Teaching with Thinking Tools. In IFIP 19th World Computer Congress, TC-3, Education, August 21-24, 2006, Santiago, Chile edited by Kumar, D. & Turner, J. (eds). Springer, New York. ||
 * Cornford, I. R. (1999) Social learning. Chapter 4 in J. Athanasou (Ed.), Adult Educational Psychology. Katoomba: Social Science Press ||
 * Cowell, M.D. & Entwistle, N.J. (1971). The reltaionships between personality, study attitudes and academic performance in a technical college, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 85-90 ||
 * [|Cranmer, S. (2006) Children and Young People's Uses of the Internet for Homework. Learning, Media and Technology Journal. 31(3), 301-315. Retrieved 6th May 2007 at: http://www.informaworld.com.ezproxy.lib.uts.edu.au/smpp/content~content=a755226800] ||
 * Dalacosta, K., Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou, M., Palyvos, J.A., Spyrellis, N. 2009, Multimedia application with animated cartoons for teaching science in elementary education. //Computers and Education//, vol. 52, no. 4, pp.741-748. ||
 * Dansereau, D.F. 1985, 'Learning Strategy Research' in J.W. Segal, S.F. Chipman & R. Glaser (eds.) Thinking and Learning Skills: Volume 1: Relating Instruction to Research, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. ||
 * Davies, A., Ramsay, J., Lindfield, H., Couperthwaite, J. 2005, Building learning communites: foundations for a good practice, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 615-628 ||
 * Derry, S.J., 1988, Putting Learning Strategies to Work, Educational Leadership, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 4-10 ||
 * Deslades, R., Rousseau, M. 2008 Evolution and Relation of students homework management strageies and their parents help in homework during the transition to high school ||
 * Dickson, K.L. & Bauer, J.J., 2008, Do Students Learn Course Material During Crib Sheet Construction?, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 35, pp. 117-120 ||
 * Dietz, F., Hofer, M., Fries, S., 2007, Individual values, learning routines and academic procrastination, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 893-906 ||
 * Drew, S. 2001, Student Perceptions of What Helps Them Learn and Develop in Higher Education, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 6, no.3, pp. 309-332 ||
 * Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., Ferguson, J. 2004, The relationship between personality, apprach to learning and academic performance, Personality and Individual Difefrences, vo. 36, no. 8, pp. 1907-1920 ||
 * Durkin, K. & Main, A., 2002, Disipline-based study skills support for first-year undergraduate students, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol.3, no. 24, pp.24-39 ||
 * Edmunds, R, & Richardson, J.T.E., 2009, Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 295-309 ||
 * Entwistle, J. 1979, Personal development and academic learning, Higher Education, vol. 8, pp. 487-490 ||
 * Entwistle, J., Hanley, M. Hounsell, D. 1979, Identifying distinctive approaches to studying, Higher Education, vol. 8, pp. 365-380 ||
 * Entwistle, N., McCune, V., 2004, The Conceptual Bases of Study Strategy Inventories, Educational Psychological Review, vol. 16, no. 4 ||
 * Entwistle, N.J & Entwistle D., ?, The relationships between personality, study methods and academic performance, Personality, Study Methods and Performance ||
 * Entwistle, N.J & Entwistle, A., 1991, Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: the student experoience and its implications, Higher Education, vol. 22, pp. 205-227 ||
 * Entwistle, N.J., 1991, Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment, Higher Education, vol. 22, pp. 201-204 ||
 * Entwistle, N.J., Thompson, J & Wilson, J. D., 1974, Motivation and Study Habits, Higher Education, vol. 3, pp. 379-396 ||
 * Ferla, J., Valcke, M. & Schuyten, G., 2008, Relations between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies, Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 18, pp. 271-278 ||
 * Ferla, J., Valcke, M. & Schuyten, G., 2009, Student models of learning and their impact on study strategies, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 185-202 ||
 * [|Ferris, J. (2004). Internet Addiction Disorder: Causes, symptoms and consequences. Retrieved 16th May 2007 at: www.chem.vt.edu/chem-dept/dessy/honors/papers/ferris.html] ||
 * Fries, S., Schmidt, S. Dietz, E. & Hofer, M. (2005) Conflicting values and their impact on learning, Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 20, no. ?, pp. 259-274 ||
 * Garner, R., 1990, Why Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Towards a Theory of Settings, Review of Educational Research, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 517-529 ||
 * Georgiady, N.P., Romano, L.G., 1994, Focus on Study Habits in Schools: A Guide for Teachers and Students to Increase Learning in the Middle School, ….. ||
 * Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., Van der Bossche, P. (2005) The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes, European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 327-341 ||
 * Grabe, M. & Grabe, C. 2001, Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning, 3rd edn, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp. 56-76 ||
 * Guglielmino, P.J. and Guglielmino, L.M., “The selfdirected learner: a valued human resource of the 21st century”, //Sundridge Park Management Review//, Vol. 5 No. 4, 1992, pp. 32-9. ||
 * [|Harris, C. (2006). MySpace Can Be Our Space: Let’s turn the infamous networking site into a teachable moment. School Library Journal, 5/1/2006. Retrieved 16th May at: http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6330760.html] ||
 * Hartley, J. 2007, Teaching, learning and new technology: a review for teachers, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp.42-62 ||
 * Herriman, J., Willetts, J., Partridge, E., 2006, Learning Together for Sustainability: The Value of Group Based Peer Learning, conference…. ||
 * Hill, J.R. & Hannafin, M.J. (1997) Cognitive Strategies and learning ftom the World Wide Web, Educayional Technology, Research and Development, vol. 45, no. 4, pp.37-64 ||
 * Hounsell, D. 1979, Learning to learn: research and learning in student development, Higher Education, vol. 8, pp. 453-469 ||
 * [|Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. 2005, Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 10, no. 2, article 1. Retrieved 17th May at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html] ||
 * Huntley, R. (2006). //The world according to Y: inside the new adult generation.// Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest. ||
 * Janssen, P.J., 1996, Studaxology: the expertise students need to be effective in higher education, Higher Education, vol. 31, no.1, pp. 117-141 ||
 * Jonassen, D. et at, 2008, Meaningful Learning with Technology, 3rd edn, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, pp.1-12 ||
 * Jonassen, D. H. (2000). //Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking//. Prentice Hall, Ohio. ||
 * Jungert, T. & Rosander, M., 2009, Relationships between students' strategies for influencing their study environ,ment and their strategic approach to studying, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 34, no.2, pp.139-152 ||
 * Justicia, F., Pichardo, M.C., Cano, F., Berben, A.B.G. (2008), The Revised Two-factor Study Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses at item level, //European Journal of Psychology of Education - EJPE//, vol. 23, no. 3, pp.355-372 ||
 * [|Kaiser Family Foundation (2005). Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-olds. Retrieved 6th May at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/entmedia030905pkg.cfm] ||
 * Kay, R. H., (2008). Exploring gender differences in computer-related behaviour: Past, present and future. In T.T. Chen & I. Chen (Eds.), //Social information technology: Connecting society and cultural issues// (pp. 12-30). Hersey, PA: Information Science Reference. ||
 * Kember, D., Jamison, Q.W., Pomfret, M. Wong, E.T.T. (1995) Learning approaches, study time and academic performance, Higher Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 329-343 ||
 * Kinchin, I.M. (2004). Investigating students' beliefs about their preferred role as learners, Educational Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp.301-312 ||
 * Kirkpatrick, S., Barrett, M., Jones, T. Defining Learning Communities ??? ||
 * Kolb, T.A. (1981) Experiential learning theory and the learning style inventory: a reply to Freedman and Stumpf, Academy of Management Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp.289-296 ||
 * Kuethe, J. 1961, Personality Traits related to "Stress Tolerance" as determinants of academic achievement, Baltimore: John Hopkins University. ||
 * Kuhn, D., Dean Jr., 2004, Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice, Theory into Practice, vol. 43, no. 4, pp.295-303 ||
 * Lane, J., Lane, A. M., Kyprianou, A. 2004, SELF-EFFICACY, SELF-ESTEEM AND THEIR IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 247-256. ||
 * Laurillard, D. 1979, The processes of student learning, Higher Education, vol. 8, pp. 395-4090 ||
 * Marton, F. & Saljo, R. 1976, Qualitative Differences in Learning : 1 - Outcome and Process, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 4-11. ||
 * Marton, F. & Svensson, L. (1979) Conceptions of research in studyent learning, Higher Education, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 471-486 ||
 * Mayer, R.E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., Tapangco, L. 1996, When Less Is More: Meaningful Learning From Visual and Verbal Summaries of Science Textbook Lessons, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp.64-73 ||
 * Mayes, T. 2000, Pedagogy, Lifelong Learning and ICT, Discussion Paper?? ||
 * [|McGlynn, A.P., 2005, “Teaching Millennials, Our Newest Cultural Cohort”, The Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education, Web site www.hispanicoutlook.com.] ||
 * Meyer, J.H.F, 1991, Study Orchestration: The manifestation, interpretation and consequences of contextualised approaches in studying, Higher Education, vol.22, pp. 297-316 ||
 * Nolen, S. (1988) Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies, Cognition and Instruction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 269-287 ||
 * Novak, J. 1985? Metacognitive strategies to help students learning how to learn ?? ||
 * Nuy, H.J.P., 1991, Interactions of study orientation and students' appreciation of structure in their educational environment, Higher Education, vol.22, pp.267-274 ||
 * [|Oblinger, D. & Oblinger, J. (eds) (2005). Educating the net generation [electronic resource. Boulder. Retrieved at: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf]] ||
 * Oblinger, D. & Rush, S. (eds) (1997). T //he Learning Revolution//. Anker Publishing Company, Inc, USA. ||
 * Paas, F., Tuovinem, J., Tabbers, H., Gerven, P. 2003, Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 63-71 ||
 * Peetsma, T., Hascher, T., Roude, E. (2005) Relations between adolescents' self evaluations, time perspectives, motivation for school and their achievement in different countries at different ages, European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 209-225 ||
 * Pokay, P., &Blumenfeld, P.C., 1990, Predicting Acievement Early and Late in the Semester: The Role of Motivation and the Use of Learning Strategies, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 82, ni.1, pp.41-50 ||
 * [|Prensky, M. (2001a) Digial natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 5, 1-6.] ||
 * [|Prensky, M. (2004). The emerging online life of the digital native: What they do differently because of technology and how they do it. Retrieved 7th May 2007 at: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-The_Emerging_Online_Life_of_the_Digital_Native-03.pdf] ||
 * Renzulli, J.S. & Reis, S.M., 1985, Scope and sequence approach to process development, Gifted Child Today, pp. 2-6. ||
 * Resnick, M. ? Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age ||
 * Robotham, D. 1995, Self-directed learning: the ultimate learning style?, Journal of European Industrial Training, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 3-7 ||
 * Romeo, G. 2004, Teaching, learning and Technology: Research, Reform, Realise the Potential ||
 * Rose, D. & Meyer, H. (2002). //Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age//. ASCD, USA. ||
 * Schrum, L. & Berenfeld, B. (1997). //Teaching and Learning in the Information Age//. Allyn & Bacon, USA. ||
 * Seely Brown, J. ? Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0, ??? ||
 * Seely Brown, J. 1999, Learning, Working and Playing in the Digital Age, Serendip, viewed 10 Feb 2009,  ||
 * Seely-Brown, J. 2000, Growing up digital ??? ||
 * Sendag, S., Odabas, H. F. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquistion and critical thinking skills. //Computers and Education//, 53(1), pp.132-141. ||
 * Sendag, S., Odabas, H. F. 2009, Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquistion and critical thinking skills, //Computers and Education//, vol. 53, no. 1, pp.132-141. ||
 * Sharples, M., Taylor, J., Vavoula, G. 2007, A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age in R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (eds._) The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research, London: Sage, pp. 221-47. ||
 * Sheppard, C. & Gilbert, J., 1991, Course design, teaching methid and student epistemology, Higher Education, vol. 22, pp.229-249 ||
 * Shuell, T.J., 1990, Phases of Meaningful Learning, Review of Educational Research, vol. 60, no.4, pp. 531-547 ||
 * Simons, J., Dewitte, S., Lens, W., 2004, The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn!, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 74, no 3., pp. 343-360 ||
 * Smarkola, C. (2008). Efficacy of planned behavior model: beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. //Computers in Human Behaviour,// 24(3), 1196-1215. ||
 * Smart School (2003) The story so far, http://www.mscmalaysia.my/codenavia/portals/msc/images/pdf/magazines/september_2002/sep_2002_smart_school.pdf ||
 * Sweller, J. 1998, Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cognitive Science, vol. 12, pp. 257-285 ||
 * Tait, H., Entwistle, J., 1996, Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies, Higher Education, vol. 31, no.1, pp. 97-116 ||
 * Talbot, S. (1995). //The Future Does Not Compute: Transcending the Machines in Our Midst.// O’Reilly & Associates, Inc, USA. ||
 * Thomas, J.W., Bol, L. & Warrentin, R.W., 1991, Antecedents of college students' study deficiencies: the relationship between course features and students' study activities, Higher Education, vol. 22, pp. 275-296 ||
 * Thompson, M.E., 1976, The prediction of academic achievement by a british study habits inventory, Research in Higher Education, vol. 5, pp. 365-372 ||
 * Trueman, M. & Hartley, J. 1996, A comparison between the time-management skills and acdemic performance of mature and traditional-entry university students, Higher Education, vol. 32, pp. 199-215 ||
 * Tucker, P. 2006, Teaching the millenial generation, ??? ||
 * Van Rossum, E.J. & Schenk, S.M.. 1984, The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 54, pp. 73-83 ||
 * Veenman, M. & Spaans, M. 2005, Relation between intellectual and metacognition skills: Age and task differences, ???? ||
 * Vermunt, J.D., 1996, Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis, Higher Education, vol. 31, pp. 25-50 ||
 * Vighnarajah et al, 2009, Qualitative findings of students' perception on practice of self-regulated strategies in online community discussion, Computers and Education, vol. 53, pp. 94-103 ||
 * Vovides, Y., Sanchez-Alonso, Mitropoulou, V., Nickmans, G., 2007, The use of e-learning course management systems to support learning strategies and to improve self-regulated learning, Educational Research Review, vol. 2, pp. 64-74 ||
 * Walker, C., Antaya-Moore, D., 2001, Make School Work for You. Teacher Implementation Guide….. ||
 * [|Warlick, D. 2006, A Day in the Life of Web 2.0 -- The latest powerful online tools can be harnessed to transform and expand the learning experience, Technology & Learning Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp.20. Retrieved 7th May 2007 at: http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.lib.uts.edu.au/pqdlink?index=1&did=1154943411&SrchMode=3&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1180935327&clientId=20928&aid=1#fulltext] ||
 * Weinstein, C. E. (1988). Assessment and training of student learning strategies. In R. R.. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp.291-316). New York: Plenum Press ||
 * Weinstein, C., Mayer, R., 1986, The Teaching of Learning Strategies, in Handbook of Reseaerch on Teaching, 3rd ed, edited by MC Wittrock. New York: Macmillan ||
 * Weinstein, C., Ridley, D.S., Dahl, T., Wener, S., 1988, Helping Students Decelop Strategies for Effective Learning, Educational Leadership, vol. 46, no. 4, pp.17-19 ||
 * Wenger, E. 1999, Communities of practice ??? ||
 * Willoughby, T., Motz, M., Wood, E. 1997, The impact of interest and strategy use on memory performance for child, adolescent and adult learners, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, col. 43, no's. 2-3, pp. 127-141 ||
 * Wingate, U. 2006, Doing away with 'study skills', Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 457-469 ||
 * Wingate, U., 2007, A Framework for Transition: Supporting 'Learning to Learn' in Higher Education, Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 391-405 ||
 * Wolters, C. 2004, Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Stuctires and Goal Orientations to Predict Students' Motivation, Cognition and Achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp.236-250 ||
 * Wood, E. & Hewitt, K. (1993) Assessing the impact of elaborative strategy instruction relative to spontaneous strategy use in high achievers, Exceptionality, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65-80 ||
 * Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). University students' Internet attitudes and Internet self-efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. //CyberPsychology & Behavior,// 9, 441-450. ||
 * Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). University students' Internet attitudes and Internet self-efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. //CyberPsychology & Behavior,// 9, 441-450. ||